USPTO serial 78400416
BIKERCHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIKERCHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Barrington Hills, IL
Barrington Hills, IL
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Scavo Pedersen
Sandra Scavo Pedersen WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP225 West Wacker Dr.Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of a program on the subject of cooking and food broadcast over television, cable and satellite | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ars Nova XXI, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ars Nova XXI, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EARS XXI, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BIKERCHEF
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |