USPTO serial 78401009
BANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Hyde
ROBERT A HYDE RECKITT BENCKISER INC399 INTERPACE PKWYPARSIPPANY, NJ 07054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | All purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; detergents; soaps, decalcifying and descaling preparations for household purposes; limescale removers, rust removers for household use, stain removers, grease removers; drain and sink unblocking preparations; preparations for prevention of limescale, rust or grease | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |