CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DESERT GLORY NATURE SWEET VINE RIPENED TOMATOES

USPTO serial 78401942

DESERT GLORY NATURE SWEET VINE RIPENED TOMATOES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3111166Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 4, 2006
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DESERT GLORY NATURE SWEET VINE RIPENED TOMATOES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Tannenbaum

Linda M. Merritt FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P2200 Ross Ave., Ste. 2800Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruits and vegetablesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 8, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 19, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 8, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 17, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 7, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance