USPTO serial 78402314
BRAWNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4092764Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2012
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAWNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlanta, GA
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
ATLANTA, GA
Other trademarks owned by GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katelyn Andrews
Katelyn Andrews Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP133 Peachtree St, NEAtlanta, GA 30303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household gloves made of rubber and cotton knit for general use, and disposable latex gloves; cleaning pads; scrubber sponges | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Dec 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fort James Operating Company
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named BRAWNY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2016 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |