USPTO serial 78402669
JACLYN SMITH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with JACLYN SMITH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jaclyn Smith International, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Jaclyn Smith International, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Jaclyn Smith International, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
Stephen J. Strauss Buchalter, A Professional Corporation1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | DECORATIVE PILLOWS AND PILLOWS | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2008 |
| 024 | BED COVERS, NAMELY, FABRIC PILLOW AND MATTRESS COVERS; BED BLANKETS, BED LINEN, BED SHEETS, BED SPREADS, BED COMFORTERS, BED SKIRTS, DUST RUFFLES, PILLOW SHAMS, AND PILLOW CASES; BATH LINEN, BATH TOWELS, HAND TOWELS OF FABRIC, AND SHOWER CURTAINS | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jaclyn Smith International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jaclyn Smith International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jaclyn Smith International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named JACLYN SMITH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 17, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |