USPTO serial 78404041
DYNAMIC DECISIONING PORTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3270478Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DYNAMIC DECISIONING PORTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Michael Bean
D MICHAEL BEAN GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP50 QUEEN ST N STE 1020KITCHENER, ON N2H 6M2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Configuring, updating, monitoring, managing and reporting the capture, processing, storage, and delivery of images, transaction data, and associated data from checks and remittance coupons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 30, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |