USPTO serial 78404093
FENG SHUI FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FENG SHUI FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lindsay E. Cohen
Lindsay E. Cohen Bryan Cave LLP211 N. Broadway, Suite 3600St. Louis, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | PLASTIC BATH MATS; RUBBER BATH MATS; CARPET PADDING; CARPET TILES; CARPET UNDERLAY; CARPET UNDERLINING; CARPETS FOR AUTOMOBILES; CARPETS; RESILIENT HARD SURFACE COVERING FOR FLOORS, WALLS AND OTHER SURFACES; PLASTIC WALL COVERINGS; VINYL WALL COVERINGS; VINYL FLOOR COVERINGS; WOODEN DOOR MATS; DOOR MATS OF INDIA RUBBER; DOOR MATS OF TEXTILE; FLOOR MATS FOR VEHICLES; GYMNASIUM EXERCISE MATS; LINOLEUM FOR USE ON FLOORS; CORK MATS; DOOR MATS; RUBBER MATS; WOODEN DOOR MATS; STRAW MATS; REED MATS; RUGS; SHEETS OF PLASTIC FOR COVERING WALLS; TAPESTRY STYLE WALL HANGINGS NOT OF TEXTILE; TEXTILE FLOOR MATS FOR USE IN THE HOME AND WALLPAPER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |