USPTO serial 78404886
HOWTOONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOWTOONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Dunn
Thomas F. Dunn Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.1601 Trapelo RoadSuite 205Waltham, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, namely, board games, role-playing games, card games, parlor games; toys, namely, action figures and accessories therefor, arcade games, self-assembly projects, building blocks, building sets, toy model kits, construction toys, drawing toys, mechanical and electrical action toys, toy construction blocks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bonsen, Joost Paul
- Other trademarks owned by Bonsen, Joost Paul
- Other trademarks owned by Griffith, Saul
- Other trademarks owned by Griffith, Saul
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named HOWTOONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |