USPTO serial 78405030
GONE FISHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GONE FISHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS, DEVICES AND MACHINES, NAMELY, AUTOMATED DISPENSING MACHINES FOR DISPENSING BANK NOTES, COINS, TOKENS, MAGNETIC STRIP CARDS, CHIP CARDS OR MICRO-PROCESSOR CARDS AND DISPENSING RECEIPTS THEREFOR; VENDING MACHINES IN THE NATURE OF COIN AND BILL OPERATED MACHINES AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR; MAGNETIC CARDS FOR GAINING ACCESS TO TELEPHONE, BANK ACCOUNTS; COMPUTER CHIPS; MICRO-PROCESSORS: AUTOMATED DATA STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY, BLANK VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPES, BLANK CDS, BLANK DVDS; LASER DATA PRINTERS, ELECTRONIC PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS, CHANGE MACHINES, VENDING MACHINES PROVIDING CHITS, COUPONS, GAME CARDS GAMBLING MACHINES; ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC MACHINES AND APPARATUSES FOR GAMES, AMUSEMENT, ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING, NAMELY, SLOT MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR IN THE NATURE OF GAME SYMBOL CYLINDERS; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, VIDEO SLOT MACHINES,CASINO GAMBLING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR; ACCESSORIES FOR SLOT MACHINES, NAMELY, DROP-DOWN CAROUSELS IN THE NATURE OF HOPPERS; TELEVISION-MONITORS, LCD-DISPLAY MONITORS, ALL FOR SLOT MACHINES; PRERECORDED MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS PROGRAMMED FOR ELECTRONIC VIDEO AND AUDIO DISPLAY AND OPERATION FOR ALL AFORE-STATED SLOT MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |