Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78405295?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78405295. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns VOICEASSIST?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78405295, the listed owner(s) include: Conversational Computing Corporation.

What is USPTO serial number 78405295?

Serial number 78405295 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark VOICEASSIST. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover VOICEASSIST?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78405295

VOICEASSIST

Q: What is the current status of VOICEASSIST?

VOICEASSIST (78405295) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Apr 20, 2004
Status date: Sep 15, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOICEASSIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Conversational Computing Corporation
Redmond, WA
Other trademarks owned by Conversational Computing Corporation

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Evans

STEPHEN M EVANS GRAYBEAL JACKSON HALEY LLP155 108TH AVE NE STE 350BELLEVUE, WA 98004-5973UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Speech recognition software and firmware for use in the fields of telecommunications, data management, telemetries, alert systems and navigation	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 26, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 26, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 30, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 15, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 15, 2007	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Apr 2, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Mar 28, 2007	PGTT	PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
Nov 3, 2006	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Oct 31, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Oct 30, 2006	PCRC	PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED	—
Oct 30, 2006	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Oct 30, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Oct 30, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Aug 30, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2006	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Jan 31, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jan 5, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 27, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 20, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 20, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 12, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 12, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 3, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—