USPTO serial 78405304
HRL TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HRL TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold K. Kyle
Harold K. Kyle Kyle & Associates1583 Spinnaker Drive, Suite 209Ventura, CA 93001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated circuits; optoelectronic integrated circuits; semi-conductor wafers, and micro-electrical-mechanical devices (MEMs); semiconductor circuitry used to prevent integrated circuits from being reverse engineered; laser systems comprising lasers, laser ultrasonic receivers, computer controlled robotic arms and/or mechanical equipment for positioning parts and/or laser beams; computer hardware and software for ultrasonic evaluation of solid and liquid parts and materials; computer software and hardware to enable users to receive and generate enhanced video content; advanced digital processing computer hardware for embedded real-time systems; optically controlled phased array radars, microwave antennas, laser radar, and antennas | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consulting and research in the fields of information sciences, micro-electronics, communications, photonics, lasers, sensors and materials, high power solid state and fiber devices, RF Subsystems, RF MEMs and Fiber/Wireless Internetworking, optically controlled phased array radars, high-bandwidth microwave links, microwave systems programs, high-bandwidth satellite and wireless access technologies, optoelectronic integrated circuits, laser radar, and antenna design; software research in signal and image processing, human-centered systems, networking, computational physics, multimedia computing and investment management technology; Licensing of intellectual property, namely patents and trade secrets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HRL Laboratories, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HRL Laboratories, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HRL TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |