USPTO serial 78405329
HARVEST STATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARVEST STATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Valley Falls, KS
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | candles, perfumed candles, artificial fire logs,penetrating oil, fireplace logs, patio torches, lamp oil, industrial lubricants, grease for machines, non-chemical motor oil additives, all purpose lubricants, automobile lubricants, automotive greases,automotive lubricants, oil for the use in the preservation of masonry, cutting oil for industrial metal working | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
| 035 | Business merchandising display services, Buying Clubs, Discount Stores in the field of environmentally friendly products, on-line retail store services featuring environmentally friendly products, Providing an on-line showroom for the goods of others in the field of environmentally friendly products, providing space at a web-site for the advertisement of the goods and services of others, Licensing of Harvest Station Mark as a concept of marketing environmentally friendly products, Retail of enviromentally friendly products department store, retail variety stores, retail grocery stores | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |