Drawing for PRETZEL CRISPS

USPTO serial 78405596

PRETZEL CRISPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2980303Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 26, 2005
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRETZEL CRISPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gail Sharps Myers

13515 Ballantyne Corporate PlaceAttn: Legal Dept.Charlotte, NC 28277

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pretzel crackersSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2021C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 29, 2021CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 24, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 5, 2018NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Sep 6, 2017CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 17, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 17, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 29, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 29, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 29, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 26, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 19, 2011NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Aug 19, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Aug 18, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 13, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 29, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 26, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 20, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance