USPTO serial 78405730
RENAISSANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENAISSANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Welch
JOHN L WELCH FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVD STE 1600BOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment contracting and temporary help services; recruitment and placement of personnel on a temporary, contract, or permanent basis; recruitment and placement, on a temporary, contract, or permanent basis, of marketing specialists, graphic artists, multi-media specialists, and information technology specialists, namely, programmers, managers, system designers, interface designers, copywriters, database managers, and support personnel, for global, local area, and other networked computer systems; employment information services, namely the provision of employment opportunity information to prospective employees and the provision of resume information to prospective employers, by means of computer, facsimile, telephone, and other communication devices; outsourcing and project management services for others in the fields of marketing, graphic design, creative services, healthcare, and information technology; business consulting services in the fields of marketing, graphic design, creative services, healthcare and information technology | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |