Drawing for S 10

USPTO serial 78406250

S 10

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S 10?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell D. Bernstein, Esq.

Mitchell D. Bernstein, Esq. Moses & Singer LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-1299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Cloth bibs, sweaters, dresses, gloves, mittens, anklets, hosiery, socks, infant wear, jackets, pants, sweat pants, sweat shirts, shirts, shorts, sleepers, nightgowns, tank tops, vests, skirts, leggings, scarves, ties, Anoraks parkas, Aprons, Athletic footwear, Athletic shoes, Athletic uniforms, Baseball caps, Bath slippers, Bathing suits, Bathrobes, Beach shoes, Beachwear, Belts clothing, Bikinis, Football shoes, Footwear, namely pumps, rubbers, sneakers and sandals, Headgear, namely hats, caps, Pajamas, Snow pants, Snow suits, Snowboard boots, Snowboard gloves, T-shirts, UnderclothesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 13, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 2006RGSUREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED—
May 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2006UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
May 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance