USPTO serial 78406264
10 S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 10 S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gardabaer, IS
Gardabaer, IS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell D. Bernstein, Esq.
Mitchell D. Bernstein, Esq. Moses & Singer LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-1299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dinnerware; beverage glassware; beverageware; plastic coasters; removable insulators for drink cans and bottles; lunch kits consisting of lunch boxes and insulated containers; meal trays; hair brushes and hair combs; porcelain, glass and terra cotta figurines; plastic cups; cookie jars; tea kettles, paper cups; paper plates housewares, namely, plates, bowls, cups, mugs, drinking glasses, lunch boxes, hair brushes, toothbrushes, toothbrush holders, toothpicks, dental floss; containers for storing food, thermal insulated containers for food or beverage, thermal insulated bags for food or beverage; sports bottles sold empty; wastepaper baskets, decorative non-metal baskets, soap dishes and trivets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |