USPTO serial 78407560
FIERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven E. Brunette
Steven E. Brunette Law Offices of Steven E. Brunette17851 Pineridge Drive, Suite AYorba Linda, CA 92886UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, personal deodorants; Eau de Cologne, eau de parfum, eau de toilette; essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in manufacture of scented products; eye cream, eye makeup, eye shadow, eye pencils; hair care products namely, preparations, color, conditioners, dye, emolients, gel, frosts, lighteners, cream, shampoo, spray, lotion; hand lotions, hand cream, hand soaps; lip preparations namely lip cream, lip gloss, lip liner, lipstick; makeup, nail care preparations namely nail cream, nail enamel, nail polish remover, nail glitter; non-medicated mouthwash and gargle, lotions for skin, skin preparations, namely non-medicated skin care preparations, ointments, namely non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions, creams, namely facial cream; pet shampoo, pet stain removers, pomanders, skin care products, non-medicated skin serum, cleansers, cream, lotion, soap, texturizers, toners; sun block, sun cream and sun tan lotions, sun tan gel, sun tan lotions; tooth gel, paste and polish; soaps, namely soaps for body care | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary supplemental drinks, food supplements, food supplements, namely antioxidants, dietary drinks as meals, namely, dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement, meal replacement drinks and dietary supplement powders, nutritionally fortified water and beverages, vitamin enriched water, nutraceuticals as dietary supplement, nutritional drink as meal replacement; dietary supplements for animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Food for animals, cat food, dog food, cat and dog treats, edible pet treats, pet beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Flavored waters, fruit drinks, fruit juices, fruit punch, fruit flavored soft drinks, fruit flavored drinks, lemonade, non-alcoholic cocktail mixes, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, smoothies, soft drinks in general, spring water, drinking water, syrups for making soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brunette, Steven Edward
- Other trademarks owned by Brunette, Steven Edward
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FIERA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |