Drawing for THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHARLESTON

USPTO serial 78408017

THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHARLESTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3266645Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2007
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHARLESTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christie Baty Heinze

CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the postsecondary levelSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 21, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 17, 2007R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 10, 2007CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 2, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 21, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance