CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TIMESPLITTERS FUTURE PERFECT

USPTO serial 78408119

TIMESPLITTERS FUTURE PERFECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIMESPLITTERS FUTURE PERFECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elliott C. Bankendorf

Elliott C. Bankendorf Partridge IP Law P.C.321 North Clark StreetSuite 720CHICAGO, IL 60654

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded CD-ROMs featuring computer and video games; computer game cassettes; video game cassettes; DVDs (digital versatile discs); computer software in the field of computer and video games; computer games software; video games software; electronic computer game programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 30, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 20, 2009MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Aug 20, 2009ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jan 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 16, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 5, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 5, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 5, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance