USPTO serial 78408136
NUTRIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NUTRIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Baird
Stephen R. Baird Greenberg Traurig, LLP90 South 7th Street, Suite 3500Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, namely, hair and skin conditioners; non-medicated lotions and creams for hands, [ nails, ] skin, face, hair, [ varicose veins, foot and leg muscles; sun protection creams, soaps, liquid soaps, body and facial washes; ] skin treatments, namely, non-medicated lotions and creams for treating dry and damaged skin, anti-aging, firming, anti-wrinkle, stretch marks, under eye and eyelid firming; all of the aforesaid wares being for humans | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | [ Health and nutritional supplements, namely, health and nutritional supplements sold in pill, tablet and powder form; herbal supplements made of ginkgo biloba, echinacea, cranberry, pine bark, saw palmetto, aloe vera, green tea and passion flower; food supplements made of omega, isoflavones, garlic, natural soy lecithin, shark cartilage, brewers yeast, papaya, garlic oil, garlic and parsley; dietary supplements made of apple cider vinegar, fat binder, carbohydrate control, fat burner, metabolism enhancer, glucosamine and chondroitin; nutraceuticals for human use as a dietary supplement to help with anti-aging, anti-wrinkles, skin conditioning, skin firming, weight loss and weight maintenance, namely, vitamins and minerals ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rwachsberg Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by APOLLO HEALTHCARE CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NUTRIUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 12, 2020 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |