USPTO serial 78409748
TECHNOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3164575Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2006
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHNOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TECHNOL FUEL ACQUISITION CORP.
EATONTOWN, NJ
TECHNOL FUEL ACQUISITION CORP.
EATONTOWN, NJ
TECHNOL FUEL ACQUISITION CORP.
EATONTOWN, NJ
TECHNOL FUEL CONDITIONERS, INC.
EATONTOWN, NJ
Technol Fuel Conditioners, Inc.
Eatontown, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thaddius J. Carvis
THADDIUS J. CARVIS LAW OFFICES OF THADDIUS J. CARVIS102 NORTH KING STREETLEESBURG, VA 20176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for fuel treatment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOL FUEL ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOL FUEL ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOL FUEL ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOL FUEL CONDITIONERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Technol Fuel Conditioners, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named TECHNOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |