Drawing for FROGTALK

USPTO serial 78410264

FROGTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FROGTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie A. Greenberg

JULIE A GREENBERG GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Headsets for cellphones and telephones; wireless cellphone and telephone earpiece; telephone headsets, headsets for use with computers, amplifiers for telephone and computer headsets, interface units for telephone and computer headsets, and parts for all of the aforesaid goods; hands-free kits including microphones, earphones, and headset adapters; hearing instrument components, namely integrated circuits and chipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 29, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 29, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 26, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance