USPTO serial 78410665
FREE RADICAL DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREE RADICAL DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sandiacre, Nottingham, GB
Sandiacre, Nottingham, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Gurak
Richard J. Gurak Welsh & Katz, Ltd.120 S. Riverside Plaza22nd FloorChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound, video and data, recording and reproducing apparatus, namely, VCRs, video cameras, computer hardware; sound, video and data recordings featuring games and information about gaming; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers, namely, digital versatile disks (DVDs) with read/write capabilities (DVD-RW), featuring games and information on gaming; prerecorded phonograph records, disks, tapes, audio and/or video cassettes, cartridges, CD-ROMs; MPEGs; audio, picture and video compression files, interactive compact disks, cards, namely, sound, video and data cards bearing or for use in bearing sound recordings, video recordings, data, images, graphics, and text programs, all featuring games and information on gaming; machine readable cards bearing a magnetic strip, featuring computer games; electronic publications, namely, magazines and newsletters recorded on computer media, all in the field of video and computer games, motion picture films and motion picture sound films prepared for exhibition, animated motion picture films, computer software for electronic games, computer game software and video game programs; amusement gaming apparatus, namely, player-operated electronic controllers for electronic video game machines; gaming apparatus for use with television receivers, namely, video output game machines for use with televisions, computer monitors and video display units (VDUs); automatic vending machines; mobile telephones; instructional and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, computers; parts for all the aforesaid goods; mouse pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |