Drawing for SHAPE RETENTION

USPTO serial 78410692

SHAPE RETENTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHAPE RETENTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Kim

JOHN M KIM IP LEGAL ADVISORS PC600 W BROADWAY STE 1520SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Silicone breast implants; breast implantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 4, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 3, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance