Drawing for VIO

USPTO serial 78410911

VIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn S. Waldo

CAROLYN S WALDO HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC2601 BELTLINE RD1-B-121CARROLLTON, TX 75006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business development, consultation, and business planning services, namely, development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projects; procurement services, namely purchasing of equipment, machinery, process units and supplies; and business management services namely, contract compliance for the petrochemical and hydrocarbon industries and for utility, industrial, and commercial companies and governmentsACTIVE—
037construction, installation and maintenance of buildings, infrastructure facilities and plants for the petrochemical and hydrocarbon industries and for utility, industrial, and commercial companies and governmentsACTIVE—
042engineering and design consultation services namely, conducting feasibility studies, conceptual design, process optimization, construction review and analysis and well monitoring equipment services for the petrochemical and hydrocarbon industries for utility, industrial, and commercial companies and governmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance