Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78411060?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78411060. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns WICKED GOOD?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78411060, the listed owner(s) include: Schlotterbeck & Foss Company.

What is USPTO serial number 78411060?

Serial number 78411060 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark WICKED GOOD. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover WICKED GOOD?

The public record lists International Classes: 029, 030, 032. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78411060

WICKED GOOD

Q: What is the current status of WICKED GOOD?

WICKED GOOD (78411060) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Apr 30, 2004
Status date: May 12, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WICKED GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Schlotterbeck & Foss Company
Portland, ME
Other trademarks owned by Schlotterbeck & Foss Company

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin R. Haley

KEVIN R HALEY BRANN & ISAACSON184 MAIN STLEWISTON, ME 04240UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	Fruit-based toppings for ice cream; nut-based toppings for ice cream; fruit-based flavorings for ice cream and sherbert, namely extracts of fruits used to flavor ice cream and sherbert; nut-based flavorings for ice cream and sherbert, namely extracts of nuts used to flavor ice cream and sherbert; ; fruit-based variegates for ice cream and sherbert, namely extracts of fruits which are rippled into the ice cream and sherbert to add or vary the flavor thereof; nut-based variegates for ice cream and sherbert, namely extracts of nuts which are rippled into the ice cream and sherbert to add or vary the flavor thereof; jams; jellies; fruit butters; fruit spreads; fruit preserves; and fruit-based fillings for pastries and pies	ACTIVE	Mar 1, 1988
030	Ice cream; sherbert; chocolate and marshmallow toppings for ice cream; flavoring syrup and food flavorings, which are not essential oils, for ice cream and sherbert; thickening agents and natural sweeteners for use in cooking, namely, fruit-based bases for ice cream and sherbert; flavoring syrup, namely, fruit-based syrups used as flavoring agents; natural sweeteners and thickening agents for ice cream and sherbert; extracts used as flavorings for ice cream and sherbert; flavoring syrup; and condiments, namely, mustards, seasonings, salad dressings, relishes, salsas and chutneys	ACTIVE	Mar 1, 1988
032	syrups for making soft drinks	ACTIVE	Mar 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 16, 2007	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Mar 29, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Mar 29, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 29, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 12, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2006	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2006	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jun 15, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 18, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 24, 2006	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Feb 24, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jan 26, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jan 13, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 13, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jan 9, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 9, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 7, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 2, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 2, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 2, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 6, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—