Drawing for NSITE

USPTO serial 78412063

NSITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NSITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S. Bontemps, Esq.

Todd S. Bontemps, Esq. Cooley Godward Kronish LLPFive Palo Alto Square, 4th Floor3000 El Camino RealPalo Alto, CA 94306-2155

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consulting services in the field of designing, customizing and implementing software for use in business enterprise solutionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 27, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 26, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 12, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 12, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance