USPTO serial 78412409
LAROK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAROK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald, Esq.
JANE SHAY WALD ESQ IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, socks; lingerie; swimwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |