Drawing for JANEVILLE

USPTO serial 78413145

JANEVILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JANEVILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, ornamental lapel pins, wall clocks, watch bands, watches, wrist watches, and other products made of precious metal, namely, belt buckles, book markers, candle rings, candle snuffers, candlesticks, coffee pots, coffee services, cruet stands for oil or vinegar, cruets, decorative boxes, desktop statuary, drawer pulls, egg cups, figures, figurines, flower bowls, hat ornaments, hat pins, holiday ornaments, jewelry boxes, jewelry cases, letter openers, napkin holders, napkin rings, non-electric candelabras, non-electric coffee servers, nut crackers, ornaments, piggy banks, pillboxes, potpourri dishes, money clips, salt shakers, sculptures, serviette rings, serving platters, serving trays, shoe ornaments, statues, statuettes, stirring rods, sugar bowls, tankards, tea balls, tea infusers, tea pots, tea services, toothpick holders, and vases of precious metalACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 28, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 3, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 17, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance