USPTO serial 78413314
HIGHGRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3175993Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIGHGRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CENTRAL MILTON KEYNES, GB
Milton Keynes, GB
Milton Keynes, GB
Milton Keynes, GB
Milton Keynes, GB
Tarporley, GB
Tarporley, GB
Tarporley, GB
BOWLING GREEN, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Thomas
John H. Thomas Thomas & Karceski, P.C.536 Granite AvenueRichmond, VA 23226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Confectioners decorating bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAPPEL NARROW TRADING LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Cappel Norrow Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cappel Norrow Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cappel Norrow Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cappel Norrow Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dovemart Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dovemart Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dovemart Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CMC GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named HIGHGRIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |