USPTO serial 78413325
HEALTHY DAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHY DAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax Alvarez
Dax Alvarez Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire Blvd., 7th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jams and jellies; egg substitute; shortening; vegetable oils; fruit; nuts and whipped toppings; and fruit based fillings for bakery goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Fruit glaze mixes; bulk food mixes for bakery goods; cake mixes; donut mixes; flour; danish mixes biscuit mixes; muffin mixes; scone mixes; cookie and brownie mixes; bread mixes; custard and pudding desert powders; meringue powder; icings; glazes for donuts and bakery goods; writing and outlining jells for decorating cakes and pastries; candy and icing stabilizers; dough; food flavoring extracts not being essential oils; chocolate, marshmallow, and custard fillings for bakery goods; chocolate and marshmallow toppings and topping syrups, and a variety of bakery goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorship services in the field of bakery supplies and bakery equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CSM Subholdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CSM Subholdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HEALTHY DAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |