Drawing for LIFESCIENCE CATALYST PARTNERS

USPTO serial 78413547

LIFESCIENCE CATALYST PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIFESCIENCE CATALYST PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Sobel, Esq.

ALAN T FOSTER ESQ BURRISS & MONAHAN PC201 SAN ANTONIO CIR STE D-160MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and consultation; management consultation in the field of life science; business development services, namely, providing start-up support for the businesses of others; market research servicesACTIVE—
036Investment banking services; venture capital funding services to emerging and start-up companiesACTIVE—
041Publication of books, brochures, journals, leaflets, magazines and text books; gathering and dissemination of information in the field of life science; on-line publication of life science information; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others via the Internet and electronic mail, in the field of life scienceACTIVE—
042Product research and development for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance