CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VISIQUE

USPTO serial 78414516

VISIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear, Esq.

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR ESQ KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and sanitary preparations, namely, liquid solutions, decongestants and ointments which re-wet, re-lubricate, re-hydrate, clean and relieve irritations, redness, discomfort and dryness in the eyes or contact lensesACTIVE—
009Optical apparatus, instruments and goods, namely, optical glasses and sunglass lenses, contact lenses; eye glass cases, chains, cords, frames; eyeglasses; eyepieces; sunglasses; spectaclesACTIVE—
035Advertising, promotional and marketing services, namely, preparing and placing print, on-line, radio and television advertisements for the goods and services for others; retail and wholesale store services featuring optical goods and accessories and optical apparatus and equipmentACTIVE—
044Optometry services; medical hygiene servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 27, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance