Drawing for SECURE TUCK

USPTO serial 78414539

SECURE TUCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECURE TUCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010DISPOSABLE SHEETS AND BED PAD UNDERLAY S FOR USE BY PERSONS SUFFERING FROM INCONTINENCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 19, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 21, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 20, 2006EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Mar 17, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Feb 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance