Drawing for THE CONTENDER

USPTO serial 78414633

THE CONTENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CONTENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY A. HECKER

GARY A HECKER THE HECKER LAW GROUP PLC1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Aerated water, aerated fruit juices, aerated vegetable juices, beer, beer based coolers, soft drinks, energy drinks, flavored waters, fruit drinks, fruit flavored drinks, fruit juices, pilsners, seltzer water, smoothies, soy based beverages not being milk substitutes, sports drinks, and vegetable juicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance