Drawing for BIG BLUE BARREL

USPTO serial 78415136

BIG BLUE BARREL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG BLUE BARREL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Helen Hill Minsker

Helen Hill Minsker Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.Ten South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Alcoholic brewery beverages, namely, beerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 1, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 30, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance