USPTO serial 78415141
CYTOCHROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYTOCHROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
JILL ANDERFUREN MARSHALL GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE6300 SEARS TOWERCHICAGO, IL 60606-6357Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and procurement of drug screening in the nature of medical and scientific research, namely, arranging for contract research organizations to conduct clinical trials | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Research services in the field of science; drug screening in the nature of medical research, namely, technical supervision of contract research organizations conducting clinical trials | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2013 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |