USPTO serial 78415300
T TRIKSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3294643Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with T TRIKSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child John Daniel Kinney, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child John Daniel Kinney, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child John Daniel Kinney, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child James Bradford Kinney, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child James Bradford Kinney, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child James Bradford Kinney, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Kinney, Bradford David, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, a U.S. citizen
Kinney, Bradford David, a U.S. citizen
Irvine, CA
Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, a U.S. citizen
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGARET POLSON
MARGARET POLSON PATENT LAW OFFICES OF RICK MARTIN PC416 COFFMAN STLONGMONT, CO 80501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts; T-shirts; shorts; pants; sweatshirts; sweatpants; hats; visors; caps; bandanas; headbands; shoes; belts; tank tops; swim trunks; bathing suits; swim suits; dresses; skirts; blouses; tube tops; gloves; men's and women's underwear; wrist bands; and footwear, namely shoes, thongs, sandals, snowboard boots, ski boots, and socks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 16, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child John Daniel Kinney, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child John Daniel Kinney, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child John Daniel Kinney, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child James Bradford Kinney, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child James Bradford Kinney, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, as parent of minor child James Bradford Kinney, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Kinney, Bradford David, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named T TRIKSTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |