USPTO serial 78415437
MAÏA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAÏA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | TABLEWARE AND PAINTED PORCELAINS, NAMELY, PLATES, DISHES, DISH COVERS, SOUP BOWLS, SALAD BOWLS, FRUIT CUPS, SMALL COUPES, TRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL FOR DOMESTIC PURPOSES, BOWLS, COFFEE SERVICES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, NON ELECTRIC COFFEEMAKERS, CUPS, SAUCERS, TEA SERVICES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, TEAPOTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, SUGAR BOWLS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, BUTTER DISHES, EGG CUPS, CROCKS, PITCHERS, DECANTERS, TUMBLERS, POTS, POT LIDS, FLOWERPOTS, CACHEPOTS, VASES, NON-ELECTRIC CANDELABRA NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |