Drawing for V-PAC

USPTO serial 78415864

V-PAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with V-PAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID E ROGERS

DAVID E ROGERS VESQUIRE SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP2 RENAISSANCE SQ STE 2700 40 N CENTRAL APHOENIX, AZ 85004-4498

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Air filters for mechanical purposesABANDONED—
011Air filters for air conditioning units; air filters for industrial installationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 28, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 28, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 28, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 16, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 16, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance