Drawing for AGILE MAP

USPTO serial 78415872

AGILE MAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGILE MAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

Katrin Lewertoff Sidley Austin LLP787 Seventh AvenueNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic database featuring roadway, geographic, map and travel information recorded on computer media; prerecorded CD Roms, DVDs, memory cards, and hard drives featuring roadway, geographic, map and travel information; computer software used to view databases featuring roadway, geographic, map and travel informationACTIVE—
039Providing an online electronic database featuring roadway, geographic, map, and travel informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 11, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 11, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 30, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance