USPTO serial 78416450
AQUA CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3349327Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AQUA CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LA VERNE, CA
LA VERNE, CA
150 00 Prague 5, CZ
150 00 Prague 5, CZ
150 00 Prague 5, CZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P. Mazza
Michael P. Mazza Michael P. Mazza, LLC686 Crescent Blvd.Glen Ellyn, IL 60137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | spring water, mineral water, natural waters, table waters and drinking waters for making hot and cold beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 13, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW BEVERAGE VENTURES
- Other trademarks owned by MTN PRODUCTS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Dubsky, Paul A.
- Other trademarks owned by Dubsky, Paul A.
- Other trademarks owned by Dubsky, Paul A.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named AQUA CAFE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2019 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | IUAL | UNTIMELY AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |