Drawing for ON INVESTING

USPTO serial 78416656

ON INVESTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON INVESTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Hughes, Esq.

ELLEN BOESNER CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC101 MONTGOMERY STSF120KNY 04-239SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Providing downloadable publications via the internet about news, research, investments, finance, financial planning, and investment strategyACTIVEMar 19, 1999
016Periodical publications pertaining to news, research, investments, finance, financial planning, and investment strategyACTIVEMar 19, 1999
036Providing information via the Internet about financial news, research, investments, finance, financial planning, and investment strategyACTIVEMar 19, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 24, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 19, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 18, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 29, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 29, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 5, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance