Drawing for STROKE RAPID RESPONSE

USPTO serial 78416661

STROKE RAPID RESPONSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STROKE RAPID RESPONSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sophie B. Anger, Esq.

LOUIS S EDERER TORYS LLP20TH FL237 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely conducting training programs in the field of stroke prevention, risk factors, research, pre-hospital care and treatmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 13, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 10, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance