USPTO serial 78416968
IAIRPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3115999Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IAIRPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brisbane, CA
Brisbane, CA
Brisbane, CA
BRISBANE, CA
BRISBANE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew A. Powelson
MATTHEW A POWELSON LARIVIERE GRUBMAN & PAYNE LLPPO BOX 314019 UPPER RAGSDALE DR STE 200MONTEREY, CA 93942-3140Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Power cell rechargers for use with portable electronic devices aboard aircraft | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 4, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Monster Cable Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Monster Cable Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Monster Cable Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MONSTER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MONSTER, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IAIRPLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |