USPTO serial 78417145
YOUR FIRED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUR FIRED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTHTHIRD FLOORNAPLES, FL 34103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the management of business and business applications; pre-recorded audio and video tapes, audio and video cassettes and compact discs featuring business information and lectures | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Business consultation; business management; business administration; business auditing; business appraisals; business investigations; business networking; business planning; business research; business supervision; business research and surveys; providing business marketing information; providing facilities for business meetings; providing statistical information for business and commercial purposes; preparing business reports; multi-level marketing business services; developing promotional campaigns for business; advertising services; conducting business research and surveys; and providing business information in all of the foregoing fields | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, leasing of telecommunications lines, leasing of telecommunication equipment, providing access to telecommunication networks, providing electronic telecommunication connections, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network, providing third party users with access to telecommunication infrastructure, rental of equipment for telecommunications, rental of telecommunication equipment including telephones and facsimile apparatus, rental of telecommunications lines, telecommunication access services; telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; telecommunication services in the field of providing long distance service with audio advertising for others as a component of the long distance service; telecommunication services, namely, call hunting; telecommunications by e-mail; telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; telecommunications services, namely, providing fiber optic network services; telecommunications services, namely, intercepting and preventing unsolicited calls from telemarketers; telecommunications services, namely, routing calls to local third-party taxi-cab dispatchers in the vicinity of the caller; telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; transfer of data by telecommunications; electronic messaging services; providing telecommunications connections to global computer networks; telecommunications consultation; telecommunications gateway services; audio and video teleconferencing services; and providing information for all of the foregoing via global computer networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |