USPTO serial 78417439
XPS EXPRESS PARCEL SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XPS EXPRESS PARCEL SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick H. Rabin
Frederick H. Rabin Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. BOX 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Freight transportation by land vehicles, ships and aircraft of goods, documents and articles; transportation of people by land, vehicles, ships and aircraft; storage, warehousing, deposit, custody, packaging, packing, loading, unloading, shipping and distribution of goods, documents and articles, by land vehicles, ships and aircraft; courier services by air, land and sea | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |