Drawing for SOLUTION OPTIMIZER

USPTO serial 78417556

SOLUTION OPTIMIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLUTION OPTIMIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald D. Jackson

RONALD D JACKSON LAW OFFICES OF RONALD D JACKSONPO BOX 56086PORTLAND, OR 97238UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Market research services, namely providing market information and analyses, buyers resource guides, product specifications and statistics, product reviews and ratings, industry news and commentary, and case studies concerning assessments and deployments of projects; conducting on-line opinion polls, surveys, peer reviews, and product and service evaluations; providing market and product analyses and online databases, providing news channels concerning market research topics, all provided via a global communications network and for use in assessing, identifying, selecting, and sharing the optimum mix of hardware, software, and professional services for projects in the fields of information technology, telecommunications, energy services, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices; providing an online market research portal, namely, providing market research information and for creating, searching, retrieving, applying, and sharing searchable market research and project deployment databases; providing document management services to enable client users to upload, store, retrieve and distribute documents, image files, messages, and other information via an online communications networkACTIVE—
038Computer services, namely providing on-line facilities for interactions between computer users concerning assessing, identifying, selecting, and sharing the optimum mix of hardware, software, and professional services for deployment of projects in the fields of information technology, telecommunications, energy services, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices; providing online social networking facilities, namely bulletin boards, discussion forums, chat rooms, messaging services, and electronic email services to enable users to establish and maintain relationships with industry peers, all provided via a global communications network in the fields of information technology, telecommunications, energy services, pharmaceuticals, and medical devicesACTIVE—
042non-downloadable computer software for use over a global communications network, namely, computer software for conducting market research via a website portal with an integrated suite of project management applications featuring market research content, research and analysis tools, and searchable databases of informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance