Drawing for RAX-MAX

USPTO serial 78417563

RAX-MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAX-MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Adrian

JAMES M ADRIAN FORD MARRIN ESPOSITO WITMEYER & GLESER88 PINE ST 23RD FLNEW YORK, NY 10005-1875UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020ShelvingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 15, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 31, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 28, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 26, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance