USPTO serial 78417992
IN SHAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3362228Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IN SHAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Cordova, CA
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, CA
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PITTSBURGH, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Inspections of existing buildings and properties for zoning and municipal code compliance; Code compliance, namely, reviewing standards and practices to ensure compliance with zoning and environmental laws and regulations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Municipal Consultants
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Municipal Consultants
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Municipal Consultants
- Other trademarks owned by MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IN SHAPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 1, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |